The surprising part is that neutering males after puberty showed the larger increase:
> However, mice that were neutered as adults gained the most. The procedure stretched their lives by about 33%, compared with 19% and 26% increases, respectively, for the animals fixed before or after puberty.
That trend goes opposite of what would be expected from a simple area under the curve model where presence of the testes correlated with reduced lifespan.
The link between male hormones and aging has always been interesting but I think there’s going to be a renewed interest as TRT clinics have become common and even men who aren’t hypogonadal can now be prescribed TRT after a short consult with a doctor from their local clinic who never turns anyone down.
Among the people I know who were more cavalier with TRT and keeping their testosterone levels at the top of the normal range for years, all of them have started talking about how it feels they’ve aged. Anecdotally, they look older than their age to me, but I didn’t realize how much testosterone was associated with accelerated aging until I looked at the research. I always thought the visual changes were a side effect of the associated hair growth changes, facial structure changes, and lifestyle factors that often come along with the people who use testosterone at levels above what’s needed to get toward the median of the range.
The numbers in this study preprint are close enough that I’d want to see more replication, but it would suggest that the relationship is more complicated than simply having androgens accelerate aging.
"all of them have started talking about how it feels they’ve aged"
As anecdotes go, I've seen completely the opposite posted all over the internet. Guys that hop on TRT and say its the best they've felt since their 20s.
Read enough of those posts and it becomes a potentially dangerous thought pattern, that the reason you don't feel like you did in your 20s is solvable. Or maybe not? Therein resides the issue with anecdotes, they're just not reliable unfortunately.
Doctor: "So yes, the good news is we can extend your lifespan by 30yrs, the bad news is we have to remove an area of your brain that generates your will to live".
Yes. The "surprising" part of the article is when the castration is performed.
(So this doesn't end up just another RTFA thread, an interesting factoid: the "bellwether" is the castrated -- and thus relatively docile -- sheep that wears a bell, helping track the flock.)
my guess is IGF-1 is probably one of the biggest reasons, male castration will lower IGF-1 permanently, there's already been other studies showing both animals and humans with lower IGF-1 levels tend to live longer than those with higher levels
If mice studies were analogous to humans, we would have cured numerous things by now. I'm all for taking correlation as worthy of follow up research, but I aint chopping off my balls based on it.
They note that castration is known to benefit longevity in a wide range of mammalian species. So I think there is a good chance there is something real here. Anyway the real prize is of course the castration mimetic drugs they hint at, that would give the benefits without having to actually remove the balls.
IMO, all the evidence for castration increasing lifespan is pretty strong evidence that all the "I'm going to live 200 years" bluster by a certain contingent of techbros is merely that. I've yet to hear about any of them becoming eunuchs.
The surprising part is that neutering males after puberty showed the larger increase:
> However, mice that were neutered as adults gained the most. The procedure stretched their lives by about 33%, compared with 19% and 26% increases, respectively, for the animals fixed before or after puberty.
That trend goes opposite of what would be expected from a simple area under the curve model where presence of the testes correlated with reduced lifespan.
The link between male hormones and aging has always been interesting but I think there’s going to be a renewed interest as TRT clinics have become common and even men who aren’t hypogonadal can now be prescribed TRT after a short consult with a doctor from their local clinic who never turns anyone down.
Among the people I know who were more cavalier with TRT and keeping their testosterone levels at the top of the normal range for years, all of them have started talking about how it feels they’ve aged. Anecdotally, they look older than their age to me, but I didn’t realize how much testosterone was associated with accelerated aging until I looked at the research. I always thought the visual changes were a side effect of the associated hair growth changes, facial structure changes, and lifestyle factors that often come along with the people who use testosterone at levels above what’s needed to get toward the median of the range.
The numbers in this study preprint are close enough that I’d want to see more replication, but it would suggest that the relationship is more complicated than simply having androgens accelerate aging.
Upvoted you but, I was surprised by this comment:
"all of them have started talking about how it feels they’ve aged"
As anecdotes go, I've seen completely the opposite posted all over the internet. Guys that hop on TRT and say its the best they've felt since their 20s.
Read enough of those posts and it becomes a potentially dangerous thought pattern, that the reason you don't feel like you did in your 20s is solvable. Or maybe not? Therein resides the issue with anecdotes, they're just not reliable unfortunately.
Yeah, sucks that we can't have serious conversation about this, everyone's so emotional about it
"UGA research finds sterilized dogs live longer"
9.4 yrs > 7.9 yrs .. 40k dogs tested
both sexes. females 26% longer. Males 13%
https://news.uga.edu/uga-research-finds-sterilized-dogs-live... https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/04/study-spa...
While it is not possible in modern society, history should have examples of royal courts having adults castrated at various ages and employing them.
Their records should be a good reference point even though they might not be scientific observations.
What do you mean it's not possible in modern society? There are men that castrate themselves.
"While it is not possible in modern society"
Self-optimizing life extensionists: hold my beer.
It just seems longer.
That’s not what she said.
Doctor: "So yes, the good news is we can extend your lifespan by 30yrs, the bad news is we have to remove an area of your brain that generates your will to live".
This has always been known? Capons live longer than intact roosters. Wethers live longer than intact rams. Every farmer knows this.
Yes. The "surprising" part of the article is when the castration is performed.
(So this doesn't end up just another RTFA thread, an interesting factoid: the "bellwether" is the castrated -- and thus relatively docile -- sheep that wears a bell, helping track the flock.)
my guess is IGF-1 is probably one of the biggest reasons, male castration will lower IGF-1 permanently, there's already been other studies showing both animals and humans with lower IGF-1 levels tend to live longer than those with higher levels
IGF-1 can promote cancer growth. (I don't think it causes cancer, but improves the environment for it to grow)
Testosterone plays a role in stimulating release of IGF-1.
I don't think anybody has the balls to try this tbh.
Nice! :-)
At a certain point, extending life span isn't everything.
Hell is eternity with the kind of assholes who want to live forever.
So is that why women on average live longer than men?
That would make a good case for castration after kids. But it needs to be sold really really well
Good news for the 21st century eunuchs on the life preferences side of humanity.
So we found a way to extend the human life. But, like usually, there is a catch.
Catch? You go through the prime of your life as male, and then prestige into Cat Girl.
So does respecting the law but what fun is that?
If mice studies were analogous to humans, we would have cured numerous things by now. I'm all for taking correlation as worthy of follow up research, but I aint chopping off my balls based on it.
They note that castration is known to benefit longevity in a wide range of mammalian species. So I think there is a good chance there is something real here. Anyway the real prize is of course the castration mimetic drugs they hint at, that would give the benefits without having to actually remove the balls.
There are better reasons to get your balls chopped off
New tech bro fad is gonna be bleak.
My first thought was Bryan Johnson
Need to see the studies on the productivity increases first before I consider it.
>> mouse study suggests
Probably the only thing preventing half this site from reaching for the scissors.
New? Tech industry has a far higher concentration of males that have castrated themselves already.
IMO, all the evidence for castration increasing lifespan is pretty strong evidence that all the "I'm going to live 200 years" bluster by a certain contingent of techbros is merely that. I've yet to hear about any of them becoming eunuchs.
I could imagine some of them doing it: they seem pretty desperate to live longer.
It reminds me of Larry Niven's Pak Protectors.
However, they also seem to be very much concerned about offspring. Maybe they would freeze sperm, IDK.
Disregard females, acquire seniority.
paging bryan johnson
You vill lose ze ballz.
and you will like it.