I am not sure why all AI safety arguments have to start with prominent people insinuating that ai will kill us. I think that it is pretty evident that there is a significant possibility.
What all of them fail to explain why we shouldn't/couldn't already molotov cocktail the datacenters. I think all these argument always greatly underestimate the ability of humans to coordinate against ai.
Very rarely in human society have a select group held substantial power over the masses without uprisings, coups or wars.
Sure I can pay an bio lab to build my bioweapon for a million but they sure won't if we have proper consequences against bio labs making frivolous decisions (death penalty for terrorism). Or say in another scenario where a million dollars only buys me a sandwich.
I am not sure why all AI safety arguments have to start with prominent people insinuating that ai will kill us. I think that it is pretty evident that there is a significant possibility.
What all of them fail to explain why we shouldn't/couldn't already molotov cocktail the datacenters. I think all these argument always greatly underestimate the ability of humans to coordinate against ai.
Very rarely in human society have a select group held substantial power over the masses without uprisings, coups or wars.
Sure I can pay an bio lab to build my bioweapon for a million but they sure won't if we have proper consequences against bio labs making frivolous decisions (death penalty for terrorism). Or say in another scenario where a million dollars only buys me a sandwich.