Im a GrapheneOS user and I don't care what they want to say about it, what's on my phone is as private as what's in my head, and you can't have that either! If he was smart enough to let the agents type in the pin themselves then they're the ones who wiped the phone, not him.
This, all day long. I think it nefarious that the border and customs authority have themselves created a legal fiction that 'the laws of the US don't apply to them, because you're not in the US yet.'
If that location is still not the US, then they also have no authority to enforce US regulations in that place... "you cannot have your cake and eat it" is the applicable condition.
If those officers seized devices in order to search them, the owner is under no obligation to facilitate a warrantless search, no matter how fervently the department promotes it's self serving rearrangement of the Constitution.
If the owner of the phone had wiped the device, on the plane or before takeoff would there be any presumption of guilt? No. And there is still no presumption of guilt.
One cannot be charged with destruction of evidence if there is no evidence that the evidence existed, and there is no basis for the current 'habit' or 'policy' of searching any device that they decide to because they have wished this to be legal.
If the person is a foreign national requesting permission for entry, there may be a basis for 'allow us or we don't have to let you in', but in the case of a US citizen, to be refused the right of free travel within the US, is simply wrong.
Shrieking "Think of the Childern" or any other vilification doesn't change what is right.
That being said; since the ones at the border aren't currently accountable to anyone but themselves, the solution is to wipe everything before transit, and reinstall and restore the data on the other side.
> More silly than sending a man to prison for wiping his phone?
Invert the sympathies. An ICE agent or pedophile is arrested and pulls this stunt. Is that seriously protected behaviour?
To be clear, I don't think the agents should be allowed to even request a PIN, much less after refusing demands to speak to a lawyer. But normalising desrruction of evidence is a direct undermining of the rule of law in proportion to one's access to resources.
Im a GrapheneOS user and I don't care what they want to say about it, what's on my phone is as private as what's in my head, and you can't have that either! If he was smart enough to let the agents type in the pin themselves then they're the ones who wiped the phone, not him.
This, all day long. I think it nefarious that the border and customs authority have themselves created a legal fiction that 'the laws of the US don't apply to them, because you're not in the US yet.'
If that location is still not the US, then they also have no authority to enforce US regulations in that place... "you cannot have your cake and eat it" is the applicable condition.
If those officers seized devices in order to search them, the owner is under no obligation to facilitate a warrantless search, no matter how fervently the department promotes it's self serving rearrangement of the Constitution.
If the owner of the phone had wiped the device, on the plane or before takeoff would there be any presumption of guilt? No. And there is still no presumption of guilt.
One cannot be charged with destruction of evidence if there is no evidence that the evidence existed, and there is no basis for the current 'habit' or 'policy' of searching any device that they decide to because they have wished this to be legal.
If the person is a foreign national requesting permission for entry, there may be a basis for 'allow us or we don't have to let you in', but in the case of a US citizen, to be refused the right of free travel within the US, is simply wrong.
Shrieking "Think of the Childern" or any other vilification doesn't change what is right.
That being said; since the ones at the border aren't currently accountable to anyone but themselves, the solution is to wipe everything before transit, and reinstall and restore the data on the other side.
> If he was smart enough to let the agents type in the pin themselves then they're the ones who wiped the phone, not him
There are interesting legal and ethical questions involved here. But this argument is silly to the point of making the entire case look silly.
More silly than sending a man to prison for wiping his phone? I think your silly detector may need a firmware update.
> More silly than sending a man to prison for wiping his phone?
Invert the sympathies. An ICE agent or pedophile is arrested and pulls this stunt. Is that seriously protected behaviour?
To be clear, I don't think the agents should be allowed to even request a PIN, much less after refusing demands to speak to a lawyer. But normalising desrruction of evidence is a direct undermining of the rule of law in proportion to one's access to resources.
This event is excellent advertisement for GrapheneOS and its privacy and security features.
What about if you keep all your secret stuff OFF your phone? Like on a server hosted in more private jurisdiction and encrypted?
Like I'm in USA and I get a server in Cayman Islands or something?
Then on my phone I only ever use my secret-site via incognito from Firefox or somethign?
its a catch22, if your phone looks too sterile, it will be considered suspicious.
you need to keep some salacious texts, maybe some mooning pix, and a shortcut to [chunkybutz.net] so it isnt untypicaly clean.