Good points, and I agree. There is a reflex out there right now that anything generated by LLM's is not human attributable. However, the human is the initiator, the guide, the decision maker and judge. The LLM is an amplifier of the human's thought. If we keep the full working session history we can show the human contribution explicitly, but we also expose the full thought processes, etc, and it becomes a privacy question if we were to attach that information to the output product. How do we shift the perceptions that are driving these hostile viewpoints?
Good points, and I agree. There is a reflex out there right now that anything generated by LLM's is not human attributable. However, the human is the initiator, the guide, the decision maker and judge. The LLM is an amplifier of the human's thought. If we keep the full working session history we can show the human contribution explicitly, but we also expose the full thought processes, etc, and it becomes a privacy question if we were to attach that information to the output product. How do we shift the perceptions that are driving these hostile viewpoints?