"Early in the rollout of the technology, employees also faced restrictions on using Gemini to write or analyze software over concerns that proprietary code could leak into the AI model’s training data, they said"
right? alarming to me since if they have clearly scoped and working "dont train my this data" flags, this shouldnt be a concern at all. If they're concerned, we should _all_ be concerned about any google ai product.
Well, yes. And the same issue exists for OpenAI and the rest. They have no motivation to make this work right, no audit, nothing. It is all pinky promis in situation with adverse motivations.
Bloomberg (28 points, 2 days ago, 5 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938111
Reuters (7+5 points, 2 days ago, +2 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938835 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48958489
CNBC (7 points, 2 days ago) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48941902
9to5goog (2 points) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48944680
https://archive.ph/5R0Hv
Oh, is people really believe anything that Google promise about privacy ?? Oh my.. people need to wake up big time now!
"Early in the rollout of the technology, employees also faced restrictions on using Gemini to write or analyze software over concerns that proprietary code could leak into the AI model’s training data, they said"
Wait, what?
right? alarming to me since if they have clearly scoped and working "dont train my this data" flags, this shouldnt be a concern at all. If they're concerned, we should _all_ be concerned about any google ai product.
Well, yes. And the same issue exists for OpenAI and the rest. They have no motivation to make this work right, no audit, nothing. It is all pinky promis in situation with adverse motivations.