This could be a generational mistake from altman. I could imagine that some article writers are pretty pissed to find out that chatgpt was skimming through paywalled content.
Yeah? And what are they going to do about it, exactly?
These AI companies have already been caught red handed stealing content to train their models and the courts blessed it. On a scale that would have landed you or I in prison.
What does NYT's reporting on AI have to do with you? Why exactly is it "playing dirty"? And what about that justifies OpenAI lying to the court (which is a felony crime)?
SAMA will Sam.
This could be a generational mistake from altman. I could imagine that some article writers are pretty pissed to find out that chatgpt was skimming through paywalled content.
Yeah? And what are they going to do about it, exactly?
These AI companies have already been caught red handed stealing content to train their models and the courts blessed it. On a scale that would have landed you or I in prison.
It’s just “Too big to fail” by another name.
> what are they going to do about it, exactly?
Who? The Times? This article is based on a sanctions filing.
[dead]
NYT coverage:
New York Times and Other Publishers Ask Court to Penalize OpenAI
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/09/technology/new-york-times...
(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48847423)
Fine them out of existence.
If they deliberately skirt the rules in the past, they will continue to do so in the future
We have to stop letting companies build ridiculous amounts of money by ignoring laws and regulations
Eh, grant the people they stole from damages sufficient to wipe out the current equity owners. (Or force them to be severely diluted.)
[flagged]
What does NYT's reporting on AI have to do with you? Why exactly is it "playing dirty"? And what about that justifies OpenAI lying to the court (which is a felony crime)?
I too would like to know about GP's roaring rampage of revenge arc against the NY Times.