This is an ongoing misunderstanding of the recent moves here. Willingness or unwillingness to spend on frontier models isn't derivable from whether cost caps exist. Comparing it to cloud spend, most companies have cap regimes to ensure that employees aren't spinning up the largest instances for every job and leaving them open, but that doesn't mean those instances are too expensive for what they do or that companies are rejecting them. Rather, it's an indicator of ecosystem integration and a common step in corporate policy structure around spend. The actual content of article talking about tier guidance and spending dashboards supports this reading more than the one implied by the headline, I believe.
My company was trying to get people to use AI, we had whole meetings about it. Flash forward a few months and they sent out an email saying they discontinued the Enterprise ChatGPT accounts of anybody not using it often enough as a way to save money.
> Citi, for example, has shut off access to Claude’s and ChatGPT’s latest models entirely, according to an internal Citi email obtained by 404 Media. That includes Claude Opus 4.6 and 4.7, and GPT-5.5.
And
> Inside GitHub things are a bit different. Employees don’t have a limit on token spend, but workers were recently told the company is looking into decreasing token spend by using open source models, a GitHub employee said. The employee told us that GitHub plans to test user-based billing, meaning budgeting AI tool use to individual people instead of teams, projects, or unlimited usage.
This is an ongoing misunderstanding of the recent moves here. Willingness or unwillingness to spend on frontier models isn't derivable from whether cost caps exist. Comparing it to cloud spend, most companies have cap regimes to ensure that employees aren't spinning up the largest instances for every job and leaving them open, but that doesn't mean those instances are too expensive for what they do or that companies are rejecting them. Rather, it's an indicator of ecosystem integration and a common step in corporate policy structure around spend. The actual content of article talking about tier guidance and spending dashboards supports this reading more than the one implied by the headline, I believe.
My company was trying to get people to use AI, we had whole meetings about it. Flash forward a few months and they sent out an email saying they discontinued the Enterprise ChatGPT accounts of anybody not using it often enough as a way to save money.
which is it? forcing Copilot or restricting Claude Code? no one can decide!
Yes:
> Citi, for example, has shut off access to Claude’s and ChatGPT’s latest models entirely, according to an internal Citi email obtained by 404 Media. That includes Claude Opus 4.6 and 4.7, and GPT-5.5.
And
> Inside GitHub things are a bit different. Employees don’t have a limit on token spend, but workers were recently told the company is looking into decreasing token spend by using open source models, a GitHub employee said. The employee told us that GitHub plans to test user-based billing, meaning budgeting AI tool use to individual people instead of teams, projects, or unlimited usage.