This is really awesome. I'm showing this to my marketing team - we were looking for something similar in the past too. I've had the pleasure of attempting to build fancy marketing emails and a signature and I never wanna look at a Word Table in my life again.
I looked for this in the past. This is the main reason we bothered with mailchimp/hubspot -- simply the ability for nontechnical marketing people to put together nice emails, and the trust that we won't need an engineer to troubleshoot email formatting on their behalf. I remember trying some OSS tools at the time (8 years ago?) and there were some templates we used but then when we wanted to modify them, the broken-ness of email html/css standards made it really hard to test.
I know the standards and practice around this are a moving target, though, so I hope you can find a model to sustain and expand this, without charging for delivery/contact list numbers like MailChimp or other incumbents.
Thanks — this is exactly the audience I built it for.
The cross-client rendering thing is why Templatical outputs MJML instead of raw HTML. MJML was built to abstract all the
table-based, Outlook-2007-quirks, Gmail-strips-style nonsense — you write semantic blocks, MJML compiles to table HTML
that works across every major email client. So when your marketing person moves a block or changes a button color, it
doesn't silently break in Outlook two weeks later.
On sustainability — same concern. Even while I was building it, multiple times I caught myself asking "is this even worth theeffort? Maybe not with all the functionalities I've built, but someone could vibe-code a lightweight version of it in a day." But at the same time, I see and personally used SaaS products with the same or fewer features selling for $2,500/mo, which seems ridiculous.
I'm currently working on a subscription-based Cloud version, but only for things that actually need an infrastructure and backend: AI chat/rewrite, image-to-template conversion, MCP integration, hosted media gallery, saved modules, commenting, real-time collab, email testing, version history, etc. Sending stays your own provider — no per-contact, per-email, or per-delivery charges.
Picking MJML as the output format instead of raw HTML is the move. That's the layer where the cross-client pain has already been solved by people more patient than any of us.
Two questions:
1. How extensible is the block system? Can consumers define their own block types with custom MJML output, or are you limited to the built-ins?
2. Any plans for a headless render path (JSON → MJML → HTML on a server) for transactional emails generated from templates at send time?
Either way, bookmarking. Been waiting for someone to do this without the SaaS tax.
Thanks — yes on both, and both already exist today.
1. Custom block extensibility: full. You define a custom block as a schema — typed fields displayed in the editor (text, textarea, image, color, number, select, boolean, repeatable that contains basic fields) plus a Liquid template that emits HTML using those field values. The editor auto-renders the form for marketers to fill in, then runs the Liquid against those values to show a live preview on the canvas — so consumers don't write a Vue component themselves. The renderer wraps that HTML in <mj-text>, so it still goes through MJML's table layer for cross-client rendering. Optional dataSource.onFetch lets the block hit your API at render time, so use user can fetch custom block contents from existing data source — instead of having to manually type values into every field. Check out the docs and playground for custom blocks usage.
2. Headless render path: that's exactly what @templatical/renderer is. Separate package, zero UI dependency, pure JSON -> MJML conversion. You store the JSON tree in your storage; on the backend you pass it to renderToMjml() and get MJML back. Since MJML has compiler libraries in almost every language, you compile MJML to HTML yourself whenever. Currently the renderer is TypeScript-only (browser + Node.js); porting to other languages as first-party packages is on the roadmap.
The whole shape — store JSON in your DB, render at send time on your server, send via your own provider — is the transactional flow you described.
This looks great! So glad the output is MJML. I will have to see how I can embed it in the project I am working on as I have been wanting to add the feature for clients to build out their own emails or customize some of the standard templates. It will at least be a big help in my own admin UI to start.
If you ship your app with it, send a link — happy to feature it on the showcase page. Also, if you have existing HTML-based templates, try the @templatical/import-html package to convert them to Templatical JSON true — should get you a reasonably close starting point.
Looks good! Do you have an MCP or API in your roadmap? The reason: managing a lot of templates and their placeholders can get out of hand pretty quickly and agents can be a good way to deal with the complexity.
I'd love to try this with sendops.dev although I'm not sure how it's going to work with the git backed templating it has.
No — built from scratch on Vue 3 + TipTap, no React anywhere. Output is MJML, not the React-component-to-HTML approach React Email takes.
Adjacent category but no shared foundation: React Mail is a code-first library for devs to write emails as components; Templatical is an embedded visual editor for marketers to build them without touching code.
I was considering IntroJS, but Claude Code generated a simpler version in ~120 lines — just @vueuse/core helpers (useLocalStorage, useIntervalFn) and focus-trap, no tour library.
No — and this is actually one of the real architectural differences from the closed-source competitors like Beefree and Unlayer.
The SDK is fully client-side — it runs in your app, the JSON templates go wherever you decide to store them (your DB, S3, anything). Nothing touches my infrastructure. SDK also has zero telemetry.
The Cloud tier on the roadmap (AI rewrite, real-time collab, MCP, saved modules, media library, comments) is opt-in — you only hit it if you actively sign up.
Hi looks nice. I am in the process of building a email management system for a client with a small coaching base, and decided to go with Maily to integrate with the React and resend stack.
I hadn't heard of beefree or unlayer before this post. What would you say are the reasons we would want to use Templatical over our current integration or Beefree/unlayer?
Thanks. Honestly, I hadn't heard of Maily until your comment :) Just spent a few minutes with it. Looks like a clean React-first editor.
I can't directly compare it with Maily, but what I see from first glance is that it is a minimalist email template editor that gets the job done. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Beefree and Unlayer are paid services that offer powerful features like custom blocks, merge tags, display conditions, theming. The catch is most of those features sit behind enterprise tiers, and you're tied to their cloud render API to get HTML out.
Templatical aims for that same feature set, open-sourced and self-hostable. No vendor render API — output is MJML, which is battle-tested across the major email clients.
Check out the playground — it has
templates showcasing different features. See if it suits your use case.
No — built from scratch on Vue 3 + TipTap. Different data model entirely: Templatical stores templates as a typed JSON tree of blocks and renders them as MJML; GrapesJS is a generic HTML/CSS page-builder retrofitted for email via an MJML plugin.
Yeah, I get what you mean about UI. But honestly that similarity is also a selling point — people are used to how visual editors look and work. Shipping a drastically different UI is a hard sell.
GrapesJS — the OG embeddable visual builder. Yes, I like it. I haven't used it recently, but I built production landing-page builders on top of it a while back.
I saw they also have an email builder now and checked it just now. Looks and works fine, but you can tell it's a retrofitted approach from a landing-page builder. With Templatical I wanted to build something from the ground up, email-only.
I was thinking this is so nice but too bad I can't use it because I'm so deep into Unlayer. Then I see the the migration page :)
This is really awesome. I'm showing this to my marketing team - we were looking for something similar in the past too. I've had the pleasure of attempting to build fancy marketing emails and a signature and I never wanna look at a Word Table in my life again.
This is cool!
I looked for this in the past. This is the main reason we bothered with mailchimp/hubspot -- simply the ability for nontechnical marketing people to put together nice emails, and the trust that we won't need an engineer to troubleshoot email formatting on their behalf. I remember trying some OSS tools at the time (8 years ago?) and there were some templates we used but then when we wanted to modify them, the broken-ness of email html/css standards made it really hard to test.
I know the standards and practice around this are a moving target, though, so I hope you can find a model to sustain and expand this, without charging for delivery/contact list numbers like MailChimp or other incumbents.
I remember doing a MailChimp "clone" in Laravel some 12 years ago and implementing an email builder using their templates
Thanks — this is exactly the audience I built it for.
The cross-client rendering thing is why Templatical outputs MJML instead of raw HTML. MJML was built to abstract all the table-based, Outlook-2007-quirks, Gmail-strips-style nonsense — you write semantic blocks, MJML compiles to table HTML that works across every major email client. So when your marketing person moves a block or changes a button color, it doesn't silently break in Outlook two weeks later.
On sustainability — same concern. Even while I was building it, multiple times I caught myself asking "is this even worth theeffort? Maybe not with all the functionalities I've built, but someone could vibe-code a lightweight version of it in a day." But at the same time, I see and personally used SaaS products with the same or fewer features selling for $2,500/mo, which seems ridiculous.
I'm currently working on a subscription-based Cloud version, but only for things that actually need an infrastructure and backend: AI chat/rewrite, image-to-template conversion, MCP integration, hosted media gallery, saved modules, commenting, real-time collab, email testing, version history, etc. Sending stays your own provider — no per-contact, per-email, or per-delivery charges.
Picking MJML as the output format instead of raw HTML is the move. That's the layer where the cross-client pain has already been solved by people more patient than any of us.
Two questions:
1. How extensible is the block system? Can consumers define their own block types with custom MJML output, or are you limited to the built-ins?
2. Any plans for a headless render path (JSON → MJML → HTML on a server) for transactional emails generated from templates at send time?
Either way, bookmarking. Been waiting for someone to do this without the SaaS tax.
Thanks — yes on both, and both already exist today.
1. Custom block extensibility: full. You define a custom block as a schema — typed fields displayed in the editor (text, textarea, image, color, number, select, boolean, repeatable that contains basic fields) plus a Liquid template that emits HTML using those field values. The editor auto-renders the form for marketers to fill in, then runs the Liquid against those values to show a live preview on the canvas — so consumers don't write a Vue component themselves. The renderer wraps that HTML in <mj-text>, so it still goes through MJML's table layer for cross-client rendering. Optional dataSource.onFetch lets the block hit your API at render time, so use user can fetch custom block contents from existing data source — instead of having to manually type values into every field. Check out the docs and playground for custom blocks usage.
2. Headless render path: that's exactly what @templatical/renderer is. Separate package, zero UI dependency, pure JSON -> MJML conversion. You store the JSON tree in your storage; on the backend you pass it to renderToMjml() and get MJML back. Since MJML has compiler libraries in almost every language, you compile MJML to HTML yourself whenever. Currently the renderer is TypeScript-only (browser + Node.js); porting to other languages as first-party packages is on the roadmap.
The whole shape — store JSON in your DB, render at send time on your server, send via your own provider — is the transactional flow you described.
This looks great! So glad the output is MJML. I will have to see how I can embed it in the project I am working on as I have been wanting to add the feature for clients to build out their own emails or customize some of the standard templates. It will at least be a big help in my own admin UI to start.
Amazing to hear :)
If you ship your app with it, send a link — happy to feature it on the showcase page. Also, if you have existing HTML-based templates, try the @templatical/import-html package to convert them to Templatical JSON true — should get you a reasonably close starting point.
This is great, i've been wanting someone to do this for a while, and was tempted to myself
Looks good! Do you have an MCP or API in your roadmap? The reason: managing a lot of templates and their placeholders can get out of hand pretty quickly and agents can be a good way to deal with the complexity.
I'd love to try this with sendops.dev although I'm not sure how it's going to work with the git backed templating it has.
I got you a gold star ;) Excited to use this, as I've been frustrated by vendor lock-in for this exact use case.
Really cool work. Quick question: is this built on top of React Email?
Thanks.
No — built from scratch on Vue 3 + TipTap, no React anywhere. Output is MJML, not the React-component-to-HTML approach React Email takes.
Adjacent category but no shared foundation: React Mail is a code-first library for devs to write emails as components; Templatical is an embedded visual editor for marketers to build them without touching code.
What do you use for the onboarding guide?
Hand-rolled in Vue 3 using Claude Code :)
I was considering IntroJS, but Claude Code generated a simpler version in ~120 lines — just @vueuse/core helpers (useLocalStorage, useIntervalFn) and focus-trap, no tour library.
This is really nice, thanks for building. I will use that heavily :)
does it store our data persistently on your server/system
No — and this is actually one of the real architectural differences from the closed-source competitors like Beefree and Unlayer.
The SDK is fully client-side — it runs in your app, the JSON templates go wherever you decide to store them (your DB, S3, anything). Nothing touches my infrastructure. SDK also has zero telemetry.
The Cloud tier on the roadmap (AI rewrite, real-time collab, MCP, saved modules, media library, comments) is opt-in — you only hit it if you actively sign up.
Hi looks nice. I am in the process of building a email management system for a client with a small coaching base, and decided to go with Maily to integrate with the React and resend stack.
I hadn't heard of beefree or unlayer before this post. What would you say are the reasons we would want to use Templatical over our current integration or Beefree/unlayer?
Thanks.
Thanks. Honestly, I hadn't heard of Maily until your comment :) Just spent a few minutes with it. Looks like a clean React-first editor.
I can't directly compare it with Maily, but what I see from first glance is that it is a minimalist email template editor that gets the job done. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Beefree and Unlayer are paid services that offer powerful features like custom blocks, merge tags, display conditions, theming. The catch is most of those features sit behind enterprise tiers, and you're tied to their cloud render API to get HTML out.
Templatical aims for that same feature set, open-sourced and self-hostable. No vendor render API — output is MJML, which is battle-tested across the major email clients.
Check out the playground — it has templates showcasing different features. See if it suits your use case.
Looks like a grapes fork?
No — built from scratch on Vue 3 + TipTap. Different data model entirely: Templatical stores templates as a typed JSON tree of blocks and renders them as MJML; GrapesJS is a generic HTML/CSS page-builder retrofitted for email via an MJML plugin.
Thanks for the response, I will have a closer look! Maybe it's just the current UI Trends that look similar to me. Do you like grapes in general?
Yeah, I get what you mean about UI. But honestly that similarity is also a selling point — people are used to how visual editors look and work. Shipping a drastically different UI is a hard sell.
GrapesJS — the OG embeddable visual builder. Yes, I like it. I haven't used it recently, but I built production landing-page builders on top of it a while back.
I saw they also have an email builder now and checked it just now. Looks and works fine, but you can tell it's a retrofitted approach from a landing-page builder. With Templatical I wanted to build something from the ground up, email-only.