"I'll let the system admin set a birthday for the user" is exactly how Linux should comply with this legislation. That is what this does.
I disagree with this law. I like that https://agelesslinux.org/ is challenging it. Expecting the rest of Linux ecosystem to actively NOT comply with a law isn't the right response.
Oh boy, it's this guy _again_.
At this point, I expect that his main motivation is becoming viral.
"I'll let the system admin set a birthday for the user" is exactly how Linux should comply with this legislation. That is what this does.
I disagree with this law. I like that https://agelesslinux.org/ is challenging it. Expecting the rest of Linux ecosystem to actively NOT comply with a law isn't the right response.
Where do you draw the line? Compliance with every law that every country passes?
So every distro out there has a GOAL it exists for a REASON. If achieving that reason requires that compliance. Then comply.
Ageless Linux exists for a simple reason. It does not comply for the benefit of that reason.
Every other Linux distro has different goals. Thats why they exist.