I feel like the models are already smart enough to be called something like an early version of AGI. It's the tooling around it that needs to improve.
For example, Codex/Claude should be able to code and "see" its changes. If it's developing a mobile app, it should be able to view the real app it's building and then make changes. If it's a website, it should see the changes being rendered and then make further changes if needed.
DBs are a solved problem for most cases. APIs are a solved problem. UX patterns are a solved problem. Yet I solved problems related to these things every day.
I feel like the models are already smart enough to be called something like an early version of AGI. It's the tooling around it that needs to improve.
For example, Codex/Claude should be able to code and "see" its changes. If it's developing a mobile app, it should be able to view the real app it's building and then make changes. If it's a website, it should see the changes being rendered and then make further changes if needed.
The tooling is well behind model intelligence.
DBs are a solved problem for most cases. APIs are a solved problem. UX patterns are a solved problem. Yet I solved problems related to these things every day.
Isn’t AGI described in contrast to specific intelligences? How can you have specific AGI?
My question is more clearer, english isn’t my first language.