> Within a minute Gemini 3 via Gemini CLI had picked up major architectural performance issue. I had it write it to a doc, had Codex review it, codex pushed back saying it's a non issue. Gave the pushback to Gemini 3, and it was insistent. Fed that back to codex and it completely caved, agreed, and pointed out that yes, it's a major issue, yes we need to deal with it right now in this stage of implementation, and yes the entire plan that Gemini 3 produced is rock solid.
Anecdotally, this means nothing, especially if you're basically saying that Gemini 3 in Codex CLI was arguing with Gemini 3 in Gemini CLI. Unless the CLI choice modifies the maximum effective context window or temperature, you're basically saying that you got lucky because RNG led you to choosing the option that worked out for you in the end.
Do you even have evidence that the "major architectural performance issue" actually was a "major architectural performance issue"?
> Within a minute Gemini 3 via Gemini CLI had picked up major architectural performance issue. I had it write it to a doc, had Codex review it, codex pushed back saying it's a non issue. Gave the pushback to Gemini 3, and it was insistent. Fed that back to codex and it completely caved, agreed, and pointed out that yes, it's a major issue, yes we need to deal with it right now in this stage of implementation, and yes the entire plan that Gemini 3 produced is rock solid.
Anecdotally, this means nothing, especially if you're basically saying that Gemini 3 in Codex CLI was arguing with Gemini 3 in Gemini CLI. Unless the CLI choice modifies the maximum effective context window or temperature, you're basically saying that you got lucky because RNG led you to choosing the option that worked out for you in the end.
Do you even have evidence that the "major architectural performance issue" actually was a "major architectural performance issue"?