All of it lacks any connection to senses, emotions and particularly, motor cortexes. Ie, there’s no syntactical flow. It has no essence. No drop offs, it’s a kind of grammatical static and that includes the imagery. How engineers thought this was a good idea is perplexing.
I mean I hate low effort slop that's pushed from every vaguely technical source and tells me it's great. It's very clearly junk.
I think what people hate is the sense of quality degradation. Everything feels cheap. Everything feels like it's meant to be consumed in the next 20 seconds, and then forgotten about. People want stuff that doesn't suck.
All of it lacks any connection to senses, emotions and particularly, motor cortexes. Ie, there’s no syntactical flow. It has no essence. No drop offs, it’s a kind of grammatical static and that includes the imagery. How engineers thought this was a good idea is perplexing.
I know what you're saying. But what you are describing isn't "AI". It isn't even "LLMs". It's one particular use of that technology.
I was trying to zoom in on exactly what people don't like.
I mean I hate low effort slop that's pushed from every vaguely technical source and tells me it's great. It's very clearly junk.
I think what people hate is the sense of quality degradation. Everything feels cheap. Everything feels like it's meant to be consumed in the next 20 seconds, and then forgotten about. People want stuff that doesn't suck.