> Louisiana's secretary of state announced last week that officials identified 79 likely noncitizens who had voted in at least one election since the 1980s, after running nearly all of the state's 2.9 million registered voters through SAVE.
For scale: extrapolating (badly) to the whole US registered voting population (~175 million) = ~5,000 "likely noncitizens" who voted at least once since 1980.
I'm curious what the numbers are after they've confirmed the accuracy of the results (not just "likely noncitizens).
what makes you think they'll confirm the accuracy of the results? they're just gonna crow about protecting "election integrity" no matter what the results actually are
> Louisiana's secretary of state announced last week that officials identified 79 likely noncitizens who had voted in at least one election since the 1980s, after running nearly all of the state's 2.9 million registered voters through SAVE.
For scale: extrapolating (badly) to the whole US registered voting population (~175 million) = ~5,000 "likely noncitizens" who voted at least once since 1980.
I'm curious what the numbers are after they've confirmed the accuracy of the results (not just "likely noncitizens).
The numbers will be the same they ever were, as compiled by the usual statistics in place for decades: completely insignificant.
what makes you think they'll confirm the accuracy of the results? they're just gonna crow about protecting "election integrity" no matter what the results actually are