> In a statement, [Senator Mark Warren of Virginia] praised General Haugh’s leadership and said his removal would not make the country safer, jabbing at the White House for sharing sensitive material on a commercial messaging application and ousting members of the National Security Council staff at the urging of Ms. Loomer.
> Amid such actions, Mr. Warner said, the firing of a “nonpartisan, experienced leader” like General Haugh is “astonishing.”
Seth Cotlar put forward his "nuts, for now" theory, of utterly unbelievable craziest of crazy shit. Specifically calling out Loomer and Jack Posobiec as absolutely cracked individuals to have influence.
> Laura Loomer and Jack Posobiec having massive influence over Trump's White House is a perfect illustration of my "nuts, for now" theory of GOP politics. If something seems "nuts" and hard to believe right now...just wait, because it's only "nuts, for now."
If you're not familiar with the stratospheric level of derangement Laura Loomer operates on, let’s put it this way:
In a sane world, she'd be on a watchlist, not a guest list. Security protocols usually prevent people like her from getting within 1,000 feet of a U.S. President… or a school zone… or anything flammable... :-)
"...Loomer was banned from both Uber and Lyft in November 2017 after a day-long anti-Muslim tweetstorm, which included tweets about not being able to find a "non Muslim cab or @Uber @lyft driver". Twitter banned Loomer in November 2018 for violating its policies against hateful conduct. After the ban, she handcuffed herself to Twitter's headquarters in New York for two hours before police cut through the handcuffs at her request. In February 2019, Loomer was banned from PayPal, GoFundMe, and Venmo. In response, she said that "left wing terrorists and tech tyrants" were "trying to shut [her] down" and that she would "stop at nothing to make sure justice is served for the way Silicon Valley has disenfranchised me, falsely accusing me of being a white supremacist, a Nazi, anti-Muslim, a racist, a bigot, and every other smear in the book." Loomer was one of several right-wing activists banned by Facebook and Instagram in 2019 for using the platforms to post misinformation and extremism. In May 2021, she said she was banned from the social media app Clubhouse hours after joining..."
Here's NSA's own history of the confirmation process.[1] NSA director is a Senate-confirmed position. Trump can't just put someone into the job.
This document is from 2022, so it goes up to the NSA director appointed during Trump's first term, and discusses the politics. So far, the NSA director has always been a military general officer, but that's not a legal requirement.
The way it has worked in the past is that the uniformed services have recommended candidates for the job, and the Secretary of Defense and the President picked one.
There's no history of anyone unqualified going into that job.
From a national security and intelligence perspective, this is awful.
You now have people like Loomer, that are seemingly fully occupied with sniffing out "hostiles" of Trump - which just translates to the people in the government that aren't 100% sucking up to him. It is like internal McCarthyism.
Imagine trying to run a functional government, when you have people like this running around.
> The far-right celebrity Laura Loomer was at the White House on Wednesday. If you don’t spend a lot of time online, you probably don’t know who Loomer is, and that’s healthy. To say that she is a “conspiracy theorist” is not quite enough: She has referred to herself as a “proud Islamophobe” and has claimed that 9/11 was an “inside job”; she has charged that some school shootings were staged, accused Florida First Lady Casey DeSantis of “exaggerating” her struggle with breast cancer, and questioned whether the “deep state” might have used an atmospheric-research facility in Alaska to create a snowstorm over Des Moines. (Why? So that foul weather would suppress the turnout in the 2024 Iowa GOP caucuses and hurt Trump’s campaign.)
in a previous age, say two months ago, it would be a career ending scandal for anyone senior to fire anyone based on what some fucking lunatic from Rumble said, but this is how eighty million Americans wanted the country run last year, and is how every single Republican politician wants it run now - if they didn't, they'd be speaking out and supporting impeachment.
These is a timer to substantively act and it's soon coming up.
Right now the government is avoiding truly unpopular unjustifiable policy while it is purging the old government and placing loyalists into positions of power, something anyone would recognize as a coup if it happened in a foreign country.
The administration is mildly bound by law so long as they don't do anything to provoke into action those who took an oath to protect this country from enemies foreign and domestic and to act in service to the constitution... but once people in positions of enforcement are replaced by loyalists, the constitution truly becomes just a piece of paper. Laws and ideals are just words on paper. It is the enforcement mechanisms which turn those ideas represented on paper into something that interacts and molds physical reality.
> It is the enforcement mechanisms which turn those ideas represented on paper into something that interacts and molds physical reality.
There’s a speech from Reagan, where he reflects on the constitutions of Soviet republics. He notes that, on paper, they all affirm human rights and the dignity of the individual. But in the end, it’s not the words that matter, it’s the people, and whether they choose to uphold or ignore those principles.
“I've read a number of constitutions of other countries, including that of the Soviet Union, and was astonished to find guarantee of freedom of expression and assembly and so forth in all of those. And you find yourself thinking, well, then, what makes ours so different? Why does ours work the way it does? And the answer is so simple that it almost escapes you. And yet it is so great that it explains the whole difference: three words -- 'We the People'.”
- Ronald Reagan - September 10, 1987
- Remarks to the Winners of the Bicentennial
of the Constitution Essay Competition
Ironic that he laid the foundation for the end of American constitutionalism and that so many of those who venerate him today are the same people who voted for this "soviet" like crisis we are experiencing now.
People on HN have too much to lose. Who is willing to put their personal wealth and livelihood at risk to protest? We are witnessing the fall of democracy and the middle class will stand aside and let it happen.
The director of the NSA, who has an illustrious military and completely apolitical career of 30 years, has just been fired. According to those flagging, there is nothing here for curious minds to dissect :-)
They recognize it, they just dont see it as a threat. They want it to happen. It is a feature.
Their hope is that power abuses will go against left, democrats, trans, non conforming women and so on and so forth. And that no election ever will be able to change that anymore.
And suppression of curiosity and engagement counts for infinity on HN, and all the interest in the world has no leverage, by the moderation system's rules.
Trump learned from his last presidency, that there can be nothing but 100% unwavering loyalty to him and his vision. So Loomer and the likes of her are going through everyone, to sniff out those that aren't complete lackeys.
When they find someone, they go to Trump with a list and tell him that those are bad people that will only hinder him. Deep state operatives, undercover democrats, RINOs, etc.
Basically his own little group of Stasi-hobbyists.
Because the US is run by an idiot. Like, people are inclined to overanalyse this sort of thing, but at the end it comes down to the fact that Trump has _no idea_ what he is doing, and doesn't particularly care to learn.
Trump suffers from a critical condition known as "Who-ever-spoke-to-him-last-itis"...
The ideas in his head are put there by other people... and when he feels ready to proclaim something the last person to speak to him is the one to put the idea into his head.
Like Secretary Esteban Sorrento-Gillis for the first two and half seasons of the Expanse? Is Putin or Vance the equivalent of Undersecretary Errinwright? Musk would be Jules-Pierre Mao. The protomolecule can be AI, I guess.
Winston Duarte was the real mastermind with Marco being his tool, if you've read the books. The show hinted at it, but didn't cover the last 3 books. Duarte was using Inaros to buy time to build up Laconia with alien weapons, while Earth/Mars dealt with the Free Navy and recovered from the attacks.
> a U.S. official briefed on the matter said Laura Loomer, a far-right activist and outside adviser to President Trump, called for General Haugh’s removal
Which official briefed on the matter claimed this?
In almost every decade or major event in history, starting with the Russian revolution, Holocaust and up to current events they were making stuff up, taking sides and spinning stories to fit some narrative. When I see an “US official” I automatically translate it to “we made stuff up”.
A quick side-observation: The real purpose of forced loyalty oaths are not to create trust, but to destroy it.
The fascist saying "pledge loyalty or be fired/jailed" knows that an affirmative response doesn't mean anything, but that's not a primary goal.
Instead, they're forcing the remaining people to scar their own reputations in a way that makes it harder for them to self-organize. It seeds a doubt: "Even if this guy didn't really mean it, it still means they were willing to lie when their job/freedom was threatened. They say they're on my side, but... have they threatened again, and are they lying to me now?"
Similar to how corruption has basically become the political system in Russia. If you refuse to participate in the corrupt system than the government has no leverage over you and you will be kept out of power by all means. They only want corrupted people because a corrupt person has levers that they can be controlled by. Honest people who are only led by their ideology cannot be controlled.
Not an american myself, and I've always disliked the excessive gun culture and pro gun lobbying in the USA... but damn, these pasts months, that second amendment is suddenly looking extremely useful
How will you use your gun to protect yourself when the government is kidnapping people? They are starting to test this power with foreign students. If you think it won’t be anyone who disagrees with them eventually this whole thing looks exactly like the 1930s except technology can make this much much worse.
Also, modern wars are not at all one by guns but by missiles, tanks and intelligence, all the guns in the world will not help you when himars are falling on your house.
I wonder if California were to pass Calexit in response to this administration's ongoing actions, what happens to the military bases and personnel in the state? Last year's Civil War movie by Alex Garland showed California and Texas with their own military fighting the US government. I took it to mean the military units in those states seceded with the state, instead of remaining part of the US Armed Forces.
Countries in general have a strong dislike for regions trying to become independent. There's just no way California will be able to become independent. Not sure about the US laws though, but in Europe there isn't even a legal framework for achieving something like this.
> There's just no way California will be able to become independent. Not sure about the US laws though, but in Europe there isn't even a legal framework for achieving something like this.
Even without a legal framework, it happens sometimes, through various means. Ireland used to be an integral part of the UK, say, Finland used to be part of (imperial) Russia, and the Baltic states were part of the Soviet Union.
I suspect that if the order goes as you suggest (Greenland, Panama, Canada), there won't be much of a US military left after the first war (the one against nearly all of Europe). Not because we'll have lost, but because the majority will have quit.
The US military relies heavily on contractors and civil service for logistics these days, it is basically non-functional without them. Unlike members of the military proper, civil service and contractors can walk away with very little trouble (other than finding employment, of course). Members of the military will risk court martial and other disciplinary actions if they refuse and may have their resignations refused.
Who maintains our weapon systems? Civilians. Who maintains the communication networks? Mostly civilians. Who builds our aircraft and munitions? Civilians. Who maintains our ships? Civilians. Who builds our ships? Civilians, but they're not very good at it anymore. Who maintains our nukes? Civilians, but they keep getting fired and rehired.
If the US invades Greenland, Europe could choose not to fight but they can absolutely fuck the US over in every other way.
Stop providing power to US military bases in Europe (naval bases might be able to provide a portion of their own power from ships). Stop or slow walk fuel deliveries to air and naval bases. Don't provide the labor at those same bases (the Europeans working in those bases would quit on their own, this would require no coordination from any governments). What's the US going to do? Invade all of Europe to fight back? Send troops out to claim European power plants and infrastructure? And hold it how? The US military (as in the enlisted and officer corps) does not run their own logistics. The logistics are all pushed onto civil service and contractors, many, if not most, of whom would quit rather than engage in a war with our current allies.
When you see the damages 13 first-gen Caesars and a couple of month of training did to Russian artillery, you wonder what 90 of updated ones can do with people who operated them for 5 years. The Russian can't fight the EU in the air, and even if S400 and S800 were as good as advertised and managed an air interdiction area, Excalibur missiles are a thing.
Russia is gasping for air. Trying to hold 1/3 of Ukraine. Do you really think they would stand a chance if all of Europe United against them? It would be ugly for sure, but Russia would be no more.
Trump likes Putin more than he likes any European leader.
If the scenario here is that US invades Greenland leading to an EU vs US schism, then it might not be Russia today vs EU today. It could be EU minus US support vs Russia with US support.
That'd be a pretty different dynamic, and pretty bleak for democracy.
No, but I'm sure there would be economic sanctions and severing of diplomatic ties. At least with Canada, perhaps Greenland wouldn't be seen as worth it outside of Denmark, but there's no way the EU and a lot of other countries would just let Canada be invaded without some sort of punishment. And it's quite possible Russia would take that as a very serious threat with the US trying to gain that much control over the Arctic. So likely a threat of nuclear escalation would follow.
There are reasons for Americans to be concerned; more importantly, they should protest and now hide.
Rhetorical question: Who would you rather be loyal to, (a) a man who grabs women, pays prostitutes to silence them, and has been convicted of multiple crimes or (b) all the people of Canada?
If the citizens of the USNA are smart, they will choose the latter. (Loyalty should be to a country, not to a leader - the latter concept applies only in dictatorships.)
Oh, and the Panama Canal will continue to be labelled "Panama Canal" on all my maps as long as I live, and there is nothing any president can do about that.
I know it is uncouth to discuss appearances of people, but I have noticed a clear pattern when it comes to the women that get sucked into core of the MAGA sphere: Obnoxiously overuse of fillers, too much (and too dark) mascara and eyeliner, straightened hair, use of botox which results in a deadpan face.
My pet theory is that POTUS and his gang mostly enjoy younger women working around them, so anyone over 30 will do anything in their power to "look young".
The contents of the Trump administration's Signal groups are as likely to be backed up and handed over to the national archives as the contents of Hillary Clinton's or Ursula Van der Leyen's blackberries.
> Maybe in 70 years everyone will know the true reason ... hahahahaha ! :)
There were some "rumors" about the "chinese" powning the "american" telecom network since years. Ah, and also breaching the "passwords are obsolete" company was interesting from a national (in)security POV.
Loomered!
> In a statement, [Senator Mark Warren of Virginia] praised General Haugh’s leadership and said his removal would not make the country safer, jabbing at the White House for sharing sensitive material on a commercial messaging application and ousting members of the National Security Council staff at the urging of Ms. Loomer.
> Amid such actions, Mr. Warner said, the firing of a “nonpartisan, experienced leader” like General Haugh is “astonishing.”
Astonishing.
Seth Cotlar put forward his "nuts, for now" theory, of utterly unbelievable craziest of crazy shit. Specifically calling out Loomer and Jack Posobiec as absolutely cracked individuals to have influence.
> Laura Loomer and Jack Posobiec having massive influence over Trump's White House is a perfect illustration of my "nuts, for now" theory of GOP politics. If something seems "nuts" and hard to believe right now...just wait, because it's only "nuts, for now."
https://bsky.app/profile/sethcotlar.bsky.social/post/3llwulm...
Such deep sadness.
But Mikeyyy still has a job...
"Mike Waltz’s team set up at least 20 Signal chats for national security work – report" - https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/02/trump-mike-w...
If you're not familiar with the stratospheric level of derangement Laura Loomer operates on, let’s put it this way:
In a sane world, she'd be on a watchlist, not a guest list. Security protocols usually prevent people like her from getting within 1,000 feet of a U.S. President… or a school zone… or anything flammable... :-)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Loomer
"...Loomer was banned from both Uber and Lyft in November 2017 after a day-long anti-Muslim tweetstorm, which included tweets about not being able to find a "non Muslim cab or @Uber @lyft driver". Twitter banned Loomer in November 2018 for violating its policies against hateful conduct. After the ban, she handcuffed herself to Twitter's headquarters in New York for two hours before police cut through the handcuffs at her request. In February 2019, Loomer was banned from PayPal, GoFundMe, and Venmo. In response, she said that "left wing terrorists and tech tyrants" were "trying to shut [her] down" and that she would "stop at nothing to make sure justice is served for the way Silicon Valley has disenfranchised me, falsely accusing me of being a white supremacist, a Nazi, anti-Muslim, a racist, a bigot, and every other smear in the book." Loomer was one of several right-wing activists banned by Facebook and Instagram in 2019 for using the platforms to post misinformation and extremism. In May 2021, she said she was banned from the social media app Clubhouse hours after joining..."
Here's NSA's own history of the confirmation process.[1] NSA director is a Senate-confirmed position. Trump can't just put someone into the job.
This document is from 2022, so it goes up to the NSA director appointed during Trump's first term, and discusses the politics. So far, the NSA director has always been a military general officer, but that's not a legal requirement.
The way it has worked in the past is that the uniformed services have recommended candidates for the job, and the Secretary of Defense and the President picked one. There's no history of anyone unqualified going into that job.
Worth reading.
[1] https://media.defense.gov/2022/Dec/01/2003123773/-1/-1/0/NSA...
https://archive.is/DWCN1
Wonder if he refused to install Signal?
probably wouldn't take a bribe
From a national security and intelligence perspective, this is awful.
You now have people like Loomer, that are seemingly fully occupied with sniffing out "hostiles" of Trump - which just translates to the people in the government that aren't 100% sucking up to him. It is like internal McCarthyism.
Imagine trying to run a functional government, when you have people like this running around.
A disfunctional government is their goal. Nothing else makes any sense.
Who's going to get those jobs, and how do you feel about them having access to all that data?
Let them have all the data and feed it to Grok so it can come up with good optimizations for the citizens of US and non-citizens alike!
The knee-jerk reactions of the incompetent sycophants further hemorrhaging actual talent.
It's further indication that Donald Trump has descended into dementia plain and simple.
when did this place become /r/politics? This is a completely unserious claim
> This is a completely unserious claim
Sure: https://youtu.be/UMYlO5eMhl4?t=15
For more on Loomer, perhaps see:
> The far-right celebrity Laura Loomer was at the White House on Wednesday. If you don’t spend a lot of time online, you probably don’t know who Loomer is, and that’s healthy. To say that she is a “conspiracy theorist” is not quite enough: She has referred to herself as a “proud Islamophobe” and has claimed that 9/11 was an “inside job”; she has charged that some school shootings were staged, accused Florida First Lady Casey DeSantis of “exaggerating” her struggle with breast cancer, and questioned whether the “deep state” might have used an atmospheric-research facility in Alaska to create a snowstorm over Des Moines. (Why? So that foul weather would suppress the turnout in the 2024 Iowa GOP caucuses and hurt Trump’s campaign.)
* https://archive.is/https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/a...
A shock-jock for the twitter age.
These people used to be consigned to the middle of your radio dial on the drive to and from work. Not the west wing.
ahh, and flagged already!
in a previous age, say two months ago, it would be a career ending scandal for anyone senior to fire anyone based on what some fucking lunatic from Rumble said, but this is how eighty million Americans wanted the country run last year, and is how every single Republican politician wants it run now - if they didn't, they'd be speaking out and supporting impeachment.
These is a timer to substantively act and it's soon coming up.
Right now the government is avoiding truly unpopular unjustifiable policy while it is purging the old government and placing loyalists into positions of power, something anyone would recognize as a coup if it happened in a foreign country.
The administration is mildly bound by law so long as they don't do anything to provoke into action those who took an oath to protect this country from enemies foreign and domestic and to act in service to the constitution... but once people in positions of enforcement are replaced by loyalists, the constitution truly becomes just a piece of paper. Laws and ideals are just words on paper. It is the enforcement mechanisms which turn those ideas represented on paper into something that interacts and molds physical reality.
> It is the enforcement mechanisms which turn those ideas represented on paper into something that interacts and molds physical reality.
There’s a speech from Reagan, where he reflects on the constitutions of Soviet republics. He notes that, on paper, they all affirm human rights and the dignity of the individual. But in the end, it’s not the words that matter, it’s the people, and whether they choose to uphold or ignore those principles.
“I've read a number of constitutions of other countries, including that of the Soviet Union, and was astonished to find guarantee of freedom of expression and assembly and so forth in all of those. And you find yourself thinking, well, then, what makes ours so different? Why does ours work the way it does? And the answer is so simple that it almost escapes you. And yet it is so great that it explains the whole difference: three words -- 'We the People'.”
- Ronald Reagan - September 10, 1987 - Remarks to the Winners of the Bicentennial of the Constitution Essay Competition
Ironic that he laid the foundation for the end of American constitutionalism and that so many of those who venerate him today are the same people who voted for this "soviet" like crisis we are experiencing now.
But people here would rather flag these posts than recognize the threat.
People on HN have too much to lose. Who is willing to put their personal wealth and livelihood at risk to protest? We are witnessing the fall of democracy and the middle class will stand aside and let it happen.
The director of the NSA, who has an illustrious military and completely apolitical career of 30 years, has just been fired. According to those flagging, there is nothing here for curious minds to dissect :-)
They recognize it, they just dont see it as a threat. They want it to happen. It is a feature.
Their hope is that power abuses will go against left, democrats, trans, non conforming women and so on and so forth. And that no election ever will be able to change that anymore.
And suppression of curiosity and engagement counts for infinity on HN, and all the interest in the world has no leverage, by the moderation system's rules.
The bad (good) things is they replace these people by incompetent ones.
It give me The-Great-Leap vibes.
Escpecially RFK Jr.
I just heard RFK Jr. wants to focus on vaccine injured to find cures for that. That is so subversive to the vaccine industry.
Cures?
He suggested infestation with bird flu which would kill 80% of the infected birds and creates the risk pf s new pandemic.
He employed the guy who faked the vaccines cause autism study to research vaccine safety.
He favors Vitamin A over vaccines for measles treatment.
Worked out great
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43574847
How does Laura Loomer have a say in who gets ousted?
Trump learned from his last presidency, that there can be nothing but 100% unwavering loyalty to him and his vision. So Loomer and the likes of her are going through everyone, to sniff out those that aren't complete lackeys.
When they find someone, they go to Trump with a list and tell him that those are bad people that will only hinder him. Deep state operatives, undercover democrats, RINOs, etc.
Basically his own little group of Stasi-hobbyists.
Because the US is run by an idiot. Like, people are inclined to overanalyse this sort of thing, but at the end it comes down to the fact that Trump has _no idea_ what he is doing, and doesn't particularly care to learn.
Trump suffers from a critical condition known as "Who-ever-spoke-to-him-last-itis"...
The ideas in his head are put there by other people... and when he feels ready to proclaim something the last person to speak to him is the one to put the idea into his head.
Like Secretary Esteban Sorrento-Gillis for the first two and half seasons of the Expanse? Is Putin or Vance the equivalent of Undersecretary Errinwright? Musk would be Jules-Pierre Mao. The protomolecule can be AI, I guess.
Told you. It was just news reporting...I can't put Trump as Marco Inaros because he is not as smart.
Winston Duarte was the real mastermind with Marco being his tool, if you've read the books. The show hinted at it, but didn't cover the last 3 books. Duarte was using Inaros to buy time to build up Laconia with alien weapons, while Earth/Mars dealt with the Free Navy and recovered from the attacks.
https://archive.is/DWCN1
> a U.S. official briefed on the matter said Laura Loomer, a far-right activist and outside adviser to President Trump, called for General Haugh’s removal
Which official briefed on the matter claimed this?
Do you really think the source would say anything if their name is in the news?
But without a name it looks no different than NYT just making stuff up.
You are free to not trust any given news source.
And I don’t and urge others not to either.
They constantly skew and manipulate information to fit a particular agenda.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_New_York_Times_c...
In almost every decade or major event in history, starting with the Russian revolution, Holocaust and up to current events they were making stuff up, taking sides and spinning stories to fit some narrative. When I see an “US official” I automatically translate it to “we made stuff up”.
The NYT always uses this language.
15 days ago...
"Musk meets with head of National Security Agency to ensure it is aligned with Trump, spy agency says" - https://apnews.com/article/trump-musk-nsa-cybercommand-doge-...
And since when the firing of the NSA director, is not something worthwhile to discuss for HN? @dang @tomhow please unflag this.
[flagged]
[flagged]
> tests of loyalty
A quick side-observation: The real purpose of forced loyalty oaths are not to create trust, but to destroy it.
The fascist saying "pledge loyalty or be fired/jailed" knows that an affirmative response doesn't mean anything, but that's not a primary goal.
Instead, they're forcing the remaining people to scar their own reputations in a way that makes it harder for them to self-organize. It seeds a doubt: "Even if this guy didn't really mean it, it still means they were willing to lie when their job/freedom was threatened. They say they're on my side, but... have they threatened again, and are they lying to me now?"
So you’re saying these tests won’t also mean people are purged?
Oh, people who say "I'll never join the dark side" will get fired/imprisoned, of course.
My point is that those very-visible outcomes aren't necessarily the most-impactful result of the policy.
Similar to how corruption has basically become the political system in Russia. If you refuse to participate in the corrupt system than the government has no leverage over you and you will be kept out of power by all means. They only want corrupted people because a corrupt person has levers that they can be controlled by. Honest people who are only led by their ideology cannot be controlled.
Not an american myself, and I've always disliked the excessive gun culture and pro gun lobbying in the USA... but damn, these pasts months, that second amendment is suddenly looking extremely useful
How will you use your gun to protect yourself when the government is kidnapping people? They are starting to test this power with foreign students. If you think it won’t be anyone who disagrees with them eventually this whole thing looks exactly like the 1930s except technology can make this much much worse.
Not if the guns are in the hands of the MAGA
Also, modern wars are not at all one by guns but by missiles, tanks and intelligence, all the guns in the world will not help you when himars are falling on your house.
Except that the most armed ones are people pro aggression and pro authoritarianism.
And it is always like that. The ones who benefit the most from armed society and those who have the least inhibitions to harm.
I wonder if California were to pass Calexit in response to this administration's ongoing actions, what happens to the military bases and personnel in the state? Last year's Civil War movie by Alex Garland showed California and Texas with their own military fighting the US government. I took it to mean the military units in those states seceded with the state, instead of remaining part of the US Armed Forces.
Countries in general have a strong dislike for regions trying to become independent. There's just no way California will be able to become independent. Not sure about the US laws though, but in Europe there isn't even a legal framework for achieving something like this.
> There's just no way California will be able to become independent. Not sure about the US laws though, but in Europe there isn't even a legal framework for achieving something like this.
Even without a legal framework, it happens sometimes, through various means. Ireland used to be an integral part of the UK, say, Finland used to be part of (imperial) Russia, and the Baltic states were part of the Soviet Union.
Even if it came to war, it would be highly unlikely with a border as long and as undefendable as California has.
Yeah, I assume you mean California couldn't defend itself from the rest of the US under a California exit.
I suspect that if the order goes as you suggest (Greenland, Panama, Canada), there won't be much of a US military left after the first war (the one against nearly all of Europe). Not because we'll have lost, but because the majority will have quit.
The US military relies heavily on contractors and civil service for logistics these days, it is basically non-functional without them. Unlike members of the military proper, civil service and contractors can walk away with very little trouble (other than finding employment, of course). Members of the military will risk court martial and other disciplinary actions if they refuse and may have their resignations refused.
Who maintains our weapon systems? Civilians. Who maintains the communication networks? Mostly civilians. Who builds our aircraft and munitions? Civilians. Who maintains our ships? Civilians. Who builds our ships? Civilians, but they're not very good at it anymore. Who maintains our nukes? Civilians, but they keep getting fired and rehired.
Europe won’t fight the US, that’s insanity!
So is the idea of annexing Greenland and absorbing Canada, but here we are
If the US invades Greenland, Europe could choose not to fight but they can absolutely fuck the US over in every other way.
Stop providing power to US military bases in Europe (naval bases might be able to provide a portion of their own power from ships). Stop or slow walk fuel deliveries to air and naval bases. Don't provide the labor at those same bases (the Europeans working in those bases would quit on their own, this would require no coordination from any governments). What's the US going to do? Invade all of Europe to fight back? Send troops out to claim European power plants and infrastructure? And hold it how? The US military (as in the enlisted and officer corps) does not run their own logistics. The logistics are all pushed onto civil service and contractors, many, if not most, of whom would quit rather than engage in a war with our current allies.
Withdraw and watch Russia start a war with Europe.
When you see the damages 13 first-gen Caesars and a couple of month of training did to Russian artillery, you wonder what 90 of updated ones can do with people who operated them for 5 years. The Russian can't fight the EU in the air, and even if S400 and S800 were as good as advertised and managed an air interdiction area, Excalibur missiles are a thing.
Russia is gasping for air. Trying to hold 1/3 of Ukraine. Do you really think they would stand a chance if all of Europe United against them? It would be ugly for sure, but Russia would be no more.
Trump likes Putin more than he likes any European leader.
If the scenario here is that US invades Greenland leading to an EU vs US schism, then it might not be Russia today vs EU today. It could be EU minus US support vs Russia with US support.
That'd be a pretty different dynamic, and pretty bleak for democracy.
No, but I'm sure there would be economic sanctions and severing of diplomatic ties. At least with Canada, perhaps Greenland wouldn't be seen as worth it outside of Denmark, but there's no way the EU and a lot of other countries would just let Canada be invaded without some sort of punishment. And it's quite possible Russia would take that as a very serious threat with the US trying to gain that much control over the Arctic. So likely a threat of nuclear escalation would follow.
There are reasons for Americans to be concerned; more importantly, they should protest and now hide.
Rhetorical question: Who would you rather be loyal to, (a) a man who grabs women, pays prostitutes to silence them, and has been convicted of multiple crimes or (b) all the people of Canada?
If the citizens of the USNA are smart, they will choose the latter. (Loyalty should be to a country, not to a leader - the latter concept applies only in dictatorships.)
Oh, and the Panama Canal will continue to be labelled "Panama Canal" on all my maps as long as I live, and there is nothing any president can do about that.
Are Americans in denial about the Russia-aligned takeover of their government or have they just stopped caring?
It's confusing because she looks so much older, but Laura Loomer is only 31.
I know it is uncouth to discuss appearances of people, but I have noticed a clear pattern when it comes to the women that get sucked into core of the MAGA sphere: Obnoxiously overuse of fillers, too much (and too dark) mascara and eyeliner, straightened hair, use of botox which results in a deadpan face.
My pet theory is that POTUS and his gang mostly enjoy younger women working around them, so anyone over 30 will do anything in their power to "look young".
https://www.glamour.com/story/the-maga-makeup-trend-explaine...
MAGA makeup deconstructed.
This is more dishy
https://youtu.be/MJEngub8SHw?si=qc4ZDl43b-jQpmWj
Ever seen the movie Shallow Hal?
Would explain it
Mar-a-Lago face always prompts a double take; is that an AI generated face or just uncanny botox++ work?
Maybe in 70 years everyone will know the true reason ... hahahahaha ! :)
Given how they violate archiving laws I doubt that
The contents of the Trump administration's Signal groups are as likely to be backed up and handed over to the national archives as the contents of Hillary Clinton's or Ursula Van der Leyen's blackberries.
> Maybe in 70 years everyone will know the true reason ... hahahahaha ! :)
There were some "rumors" about the "chinese" powning the "american" telecom network since years. Ah, and also breaching the "passwords are obsolete" company was interesting from a national (in)security POV.